233 datasets found

Today, cities are looking farther beyond their limits for clean water. Many cities rely partially or totally on surface water sources. The study of the Natural Conservancy focus on the analysis of surface water quality and quantity. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

Today, cities are looking farther beyond their limits for clean water. Many cities rely partially or totally on non-surface water like groundwater. The study of the Natural Conservancy focus on the analysis of surface water quality, while accounting for the groundwater importance in urban supply but without evaluation of the sustainability of the source. For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

Today, cities are looking farther beyond their limits for clean water. Some cities involve desalinization procedures, investing billions of dollars to partially supply clean water. This kind of process in energy intensive, therefore, countries with a combination between water scarce and oil rich are the most probable to use this technique. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

In cases were the watersheds are exploited for intensive agricultural purposes, as consequence the fertilizer concentration increase. Thus, the fertilizer filters into the water and rise the accumulation of common nutrients, phosphorus and nitrogen, affecting their proper cycle. Around 384 million urbanities receive their drinking water from watersheds with high nutrient pollution. This map shows the total quantity of phosphorous moving out of a watershed in a given time interval, being expressed as units of tonnes/km2/year, organized into four categories: “Low” if < 8kg/km2; “Medium” if 8-20 kg/km2; “High” if > 20 kg/km2 and “No Information”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The use of the land covering the watersheds have an enormous impact in the cost and treatment of the water, as well as for the availability and quality of the water supply. Globally, a watershed is covered by 40 percent of forestall area, 30 percent of cropland and 20 percent of grassland and pasture; but it will vary from country to country. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The land use greatly influence water quality on the one supplied by watersheds. Land use changes often increase significantly the sedimentation and nutrient pollution. Human activity can generate as well pollutant concentration rising and heavily affect water treatment cost for urban supply. This map shows the total quantity of sediment moving out of a watershed in a given time interval, being expressed as units of tonnes/km2/year.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

Water withdrawals or water abstractions, is the freshwater taken from ground or surface water sources and conveyed to a place of use. These, normally, are sectorial distributed and in this specific case, five of the most important water sectors such as irrigation, livestock-based agriculture, industry, thermal electricity production, and households and small businesses are examined. (Estimated from the WaterGAP3 model) This map shows the quantity of WTA taken from available watersheds, presented in two categories (considering a threshold of 40%) being Stressed or Not Stressed.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The land use greatly influence water quality on the one supplied by watersheds. Land use changes often increase significantly the sedimentation and nutrient pollution. Human activity can generate as well pollutant concentration rising and heavily affect water treatment cost for urban supply. This map shows the total quantity of sediment moving out of a watershed in a given time interval, being expressed as units of tonnes/km2/year, organized into four categories: “Low” if <6 tonnes/km2; “Medium” if between 6-40 tonnes/km2; “High” if > 40 tonnes/km2, and “No information”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The use of the land covering the watersheds have an enormous impact in the cost and treatment of the water, as well as for the availability and quality of the water supply. Globally, a watershed is covered by 40 percent of forestall area, 30 percent of cropland and 20 percent of grassland and pasture; but it will vary from country to country. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The use of the land covering the watersheds have an enormous impact in the cost and treatment of the water, as well as for the availability and quality of the water supply. Globally, a watershed is covered by 40 percent of forestall area, 30 percent of cropland and 20 percent of grassland and pasture; but it will vary from country to country. Barren includes deserts in rock and ice. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

This map shows the source watersheds of 534 cities."Although the 100 largest cities in the world occupy less than 1 percent of our planet’s land area, their source watersheds — the rivers, forests and other ecosystems from which they get their water— cover over 12 percent. [...] The availability and quality of that water supply, and hence the costs to move and treat it, depend heavily on how land in those source watersheds is used." (Nature Conservancy, 2015). For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

The use of the land covering the watersheds have an enormous impact in the cost and treatment of the water, as well as for the availability and quality of the water supply. Globally, a watershed is covered by 40 percent of forestall area, 30 percent of cropland and 20 percent of grassland and pasture; but it will vary from country to country. This footprint analysis involve 534 cities, who draw water from 20 percent of the world’s land surface.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

Water withdrawals or water abstractions, is the freshwater taken from ground or surface water sources and conveyed to a place of use. These, normally, are sectorial distributed and in this specific case, five of the most important water sectors such as irrigation, livestock-based agriculture, industry, thermal electricity production, and households and small businesses are examined. (Estimated from the WaterGAP3 model) This map shows the quantity of WTA taken from available watersheds. For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true

To help determine where watershed conservation can help secure water for cities, we estimated the effectiveness of five common conservation strategies: land protection, reforestation, riparian restoration, agricultural best management practices, and forest fuel reduction. For each strategy, we evaluated how effectively it reduces sedimentation and nutrient pollution in more than 2,000 source watersheds that serve over 500 cities. This map shows the potential of cities to do so in four categories: <10km2 is “High”, 10-100km2 is “Medium”, > 100km2 is “Low”. Note that cities that predominately (>0.5) use something other than surface water, or cities that get the significant majority of their water (>0.66) from sources that this strategy cannot help, are classified as “Insufficient scope”.For more information, access the Urban Water Blueprint report here: http://www.iwa-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Urban-Water-Blueprint-Report.pdfYou can also visit the Urban Water Blueprint website here: http://water.nature.org/waterblueprint/#/intro=true